Sunday, November 10, 2024

Dear Dems: You’re Not the Lesser of Two Evils Anymore


You keep telling us “Trust people when they tell you who they are. They know themselves better than you do.” Apparently, this only applies to men who say they’re women and children who’ve been made to feel they don’t belong in their own bodies, because you’re doing everything in your power to avoid listening to the voters who rejected you. Apparently, all you highly-educated, enlightened people know us better than we could ever know ourselves. 


(I have a master’s degree and voted Dem for 30 years, by the way. You keep calling me “uneducated” and “far right” It’s weird. And symptomatic.)


The issue isn’t “trans rights” or “trans athletes” or “trans kids” - it’s what every single one of those phrases says about you. You’re liars. You’re gaslighters. You’re sanctimonious authoritarians. You’re the political party equivalent of Dolores Umbridge.


You’re also sexist, homophobic, and racist.


For years you’ve been pressuring us to vote for the “lesser of two evils.” For millions of voters, you’re no longer the lesser evil.


“How could you vote for a rapist?” 


Well first of all, I didn’t. I stayed home. But also:

    • How could you vote to put rapists in women’s prisons, rape shelters, homeless shelters and hospital wards? WTF happened to caring about “the most vulnerable?”
    • How could you tell us we don’t need female-only bathrooms and changing rooms because men are just going to rape us anyway? That we’re most likely to be raped by men we know - and what, you’d like to level the playing field for men we don’t know?
    • How could you tell women who are afraid of rape and sexual harassment/assault that they’re just pearl-clutching bigots "obsessed with other people’s genitals?"
    • How could you think this would win you our votes?

“But it’s a fringe issue, and he’s going to end the world!”


OH RLY. All we wanted was the word “woman” codified to mean female people, the protection of female boundaries, and for you to stop telling kids they don’t belong in their own bodies. That’s it. To get our votes and thereby avert Armageddon. AND YOU WOULDN’T DO IT. Redefining women as ladybrains, destroying all our boundaries and medically brutalizing gender non-conforming kids affects more than half the population, and is putting millions of dollars in your party coffers. Fringe issue my ass. 


“Why do you care about trans athletes? It’s such a small number!”


First and foremost, STOP SAYING "TRANS" WHEN YOU MEAN “MALE.” I MEAN IT. The issue is male people in female sports, and YOU KNOW IT.


Second, the real numbers are bigger than you think.


Third, for each male athlete you “include” in female sports, many more female athletes are harmed. They don’t just displace the woman or girl who should have had a chance to compete. Many more have to change in front of men, play against men (often risking catastrophic injury), and lose their medals, scholarships, prize money and records to men.


I call this exercise “misogynist math.” Just how many women and girls have to be hurt before we matter to you? Can we get a number?


“Why do you hate trans kids?”


I can think of very few things more hateful than telling children they don’t belong in their own bodies, they must be disguised as the opposite sex or else they’re doomed to kill themselves or be murdered, and anyone who tells them they are fine as they are secretly wants them dead. I can’t believe you’re telling kids that the new administration is coming to take them away and then posting skyrocketing suicide hotline calls as evidence of anything other than your heartbreaking mental health abuses.


You’re also blocking research showing how much your drive to medically brutalize children into facsimiles of the opposite sex damages them physically and mentally. This is the stuff of horror movies, truly. Conservatives never took conversion therapy so far as to put a little boy in line for penis removal because he wanted to play Barbies.


“What about women’s healthcare?”


I’m not even going to be able to delve into this fully right now, because the sheer gall it takes to spend years telling us that we can’t define women as female people because 1) having a word for the class of people who might ever get pregnant necessarily reduces us to livestock and 2) men get pregnant too, then turn around and code abortion rights as “women’s healthcare,” makes me so angry I’d happily just light a cigarette and watch the world burn.


By the way, if you give a shit about preventing unwanted pregnancies under the new regime, kindly tell all the woke bros to get vasectomies or else forgo recreational (heterosexual) sex for the foreseeable future. Walk the talk, as they say. Otherwise I can’t help but think your support for abortion rights has nothing to do with women’s liberation, only men’s ejaculation.


“What do you mean we’re sexist and homophobic?”


I mean we never consented to redefine women as ladybrains or men as Those Of Acceptably Masculine Souls, and that this new state religion of sexed brains and souls is just like the old religion of sexed brains and souls, just with added newspeak, syringes and scalpels.


I mean we’ve been through “inversion theory” before and gay people do not have selves metaphysically misplaced in the wrong bodies, they are not cosmic mistakes, they’re just gay.


I mean telling lesbians to do dick is rapey as hell.


I mean that defending all kinds of perversion because apparently, if homosexuality isn't a perversion, then nothing is, NTM asking "What could you possibly mean by 'normal gays'?" shows that you think gay people are all abnormal perverts, but hey, you're OK with that.


“What do you mean we’re racist?”


I mean if you don’t stop comparing black women to men I swear to god I’m going to lose it.


I also mean that you honestly seem to think minorities cannot succeed without lower standards.


I mean you use DEI to hire and promote minorities who toe and tout the party line, then when they fail you blame racism, rather than the party line. I mean you use DEI to hire and promote unqualified people - when there are plenty of qualified people of minority races and ethnicities out there - because you want people you can control. And you don’t care how this makes minorities look incompetent, as long as you get to check the boxes that make you feel like you’re a Good Person.


And I mean that as soon as minorities step out of line and vote in a way you don't like, you show your true colors. 


(By the way, you’re also classist, ageist and ableist! But I’ll get to all that on another day.)


***

To sum up:


    1. The issue isn’t “trans rights.” It’s that you’re so sexist and homophobic you have to hallucinate some people are the opposite sex in order to tolerate their existence; you’re so totalitarian that you think you have the right to force everyone else to pretend; and you’re so puritanical you cast out anyone who objects and label them terrible subhuman bigots. Men aren’t women, and people who know men aren’t women aren’t bad people, you’re just nuts.

    2. Your determination to destroy women’s boundaries means your positions on rape and reproductive health are face-meltingly hypocritical;

    3. You’re so arrogant you can’t even comprehend how racist you are;

    4. You’re so obsessed with looking cool and feeling superior that you cannot listen to others nor can you ever tell the truth in plain, direct language. Your buzzword salad is never evidence of your education, only your indoctrination, and your “be kind” platitudes are thinly veiled instructions to submit. Just because the flag you’ve wrapped around yourself has a rainbow on it doesn’t mean you’re not behaving like a petty dictator.

    5. All of the hate and fear you project onto others is your own hate and fear. Poor rural whites are not the problem. TERFs are not the problem. Gays and minorities who won’t do your bidding are not the problem. You are the problem. You can reflect and change, or you can keep losing elections.



Friday, April 5, 2024

Abstaining from voting Democrat

 I am a lifelong Democratic voter, henceforth abstaining from voting for the Democratic Party.

I will never vote for Trump or support a party that courts white supremacists.

I will also never vote for anyone who refuses to categorically state that 1) sex is real, and 2) sexism is wrong.

I will never support a party whose members think that women who do hold these two beliefs (sex is real, sexism is wrong) deserve to be denounced as sub-human bigots, barred from employment and left to the mercy of mobs spouting rape and death threats.

I have three very simple demands, which require only the barest modicum of integrity to support.

1) We should be able to name sex classes in humans.
  • The word “woman” should continue to mean “female human adult.”
  • The word “girl” should continue to mean “female human child.”
  • The word “female” should continue to mean “the sex which, during healthy sexual maturity, produces ova.”
  • The word “man” should continue to mean “male human adult.”
  • The word “boy” should continue to mean “male human child.”
  •  The word “male” should continue to mean “the sex which, during healthy sexual maturity, produces sperm.”
These words are descriptive of biology and not prescriptive of personality.

2) No child should be told he or she was born in the wrong body. Boys should be free to defy masculine gender norms without bullying. Girls should be free to defy feminine gender norms without bullying. No child should be medically transitioned into a facsimile of the opposite sex.

3) The Democratic Party should condemn the abuse, silencing and persecution of feminists.

These three demands are non-negotiable.
  • You can tell me I am somehow responsible for male violence and/or male suicide.
  • You can tell me that in fighting sexism I am somehow being racist or homophobic.
  • You can tell me that I have no choice but to vote for woman-hating party B or be responsible for woman-hating party A retaining power.
  • You can call me names and threaten me.
You will not bully me into voting against myself.

I will not vote for anyone who does not meet these three demands.

Sunday, March 12, 2017

Your Male Privilege Is Showing

Feminist: Male and female humans are socialized differently. Male socialization results in male privilege.

Transwoman: Untrue! I was bullied as a child for not being masculine! My girlhood was stolen from me!

Feminist: First of all, girls are bullied if they are not feminine enough, and also bullied if they are feminine enough, because femininity is all about subjugation. Female socialization is the process of grooming girls for the subordinate sex class “woman.” Your fantasy that being female would have saved you from being bullied is just that, a fantasy. 

Secondly, being bullied for a lack of masculinity is an experience of boyhood. Male socialization is the process of grooming boys for the dominant sex class “man.” Part of that socialization is the idea that all males are naturally dominant, so there must be something wrong with boys who are not dominant. This is a lie. There is nothing wrong with boys who are not dominant – which is to say, not masculine. It's the bullies who are wrong.

Thirdly, that bullying, as awful as it is, does not erase male privilege. This is illustrated very clearly by the behavior of transwomen who:

1)  Rather than build their own movement, expect women to center them in feminism;
2)  Do not read any feminist texts before mansplaining gender -- in fact redefining the word entirely -- to feminists.
3)  Overwrite the misery of feminine socialization with their own fantasy of easy girlhood;
4)  Demand women give up any language to describe our female biology;
5)  Demand lesbians have sex with a be-penised individual if that individual thinks his penis is female;
6)  Demand women budge over and make room every time men want to exclude a male person from manhood;
7)  Express violently misogynistic sentiments whenever these demands are denied;
8)  And are still treated as the most oppressed people ever by the mainstream Left.

Transwoman: She's a TERF! Go after her job!

~End Scene~

"Trans-inclusive" feminism, a vignette


Sunday, May 15, 2016

9 out of 10 conversations with Lefty dupes about bathroom bills


LD: Look at this picture of a transitioned, passing transman. You're gonna make this person who totally looks like a dude use the women's room. That's going to frighten women! That's wrong!*
Me: So it's wrong for someone who looks like a dude to use the women's room?
LD: Of course!
Me: Here are photographs of ten transwomen who are obviously male. Some have taken no steps to transition and even still wear beards. Some are convicted criminals. Do they belong in the women's room?



LD: Those aren't really transwomen.
Me: A transwoman is any male who simply claims to "feel like a woman." Here is a chart of gender identity laws and a page full of social media screencaps that back up this definition.
LD: No man is going to fake being trans just to enter the women's room.
LD: Well those aren't real transwomen, they're just men faking it to get into women's restrooms.
Me: You just said that never happens.
LD: Fumes. Look, we can't force transwomen to share bathrooms with men, men are dangerous!
Me: I agree men are dangerous, which is why we need to write gender identity laws that make sure they are not allowed free entry into female spaces.
LD: God, why are you so paranoid about sharing a bathroom with men?
Me: You just said men are dangerous.
LD: WHATEVER, YOU ARE A BIGOT!!!

~*End scene: It is bigoted to name male violence as the problem.*~


*Nobody is actually checking genitals, which means transpeople who pass aren't effected. Also, someone who has transitioned but doesn't pass can still acquire opposite-sex designation on their official documents. Either way, actual transpeople can continue using their preferred restroom.

Saturday, April 30, 2016

Your meme is stupid, and it makes you look stupid.

So many clueless Leftists are posting this meme in the wake of House Bill 2 in North Carolina:


1) This fully transitioned, passing transman would have no problem using the men's room. Nobody is actually "checking genitals."

2) If you think it's wrong for someone who looks like a man to use the women's room, why in the world would you support overly broad gender identity laws, which allow any male who claims to "feel like a woman" to enter female spaces?

Do you think these dudes belong in the women's room? 



STOP BEING SANCTIMONIOUS FOR LONG ENOUGH TO FIND OUT WHAT YOU ARE ACTUALLY SUPPORTING. I LAY IT ALL OUT FOR YOU HERE: thenewbacklash.blogspot.com.

Here's another popular and very stupid meme related to HB2:


Cute, right? Nothing cuter than making light of sexual crimes against children! 

Laverne Cox is not a child predator, but you know who is? Synthia China Blast, for whom Laverne Cox launched a media support campaign.


Blast was a gang member convicted of the rape, murder and abuse of the corpse of 13 year old Ebony Nicole Williams. In prison, he splits his time between petitioning for state-funded SRS and maintaining a romantic relationship with the copycat Zodiac killer, Eddie Seda.

Want more examples of transwomen who have committed crimes against women and children? There are ~150 incidents linked from Allison's Law, and many more from TransCrimeUK. Please stop saying this never happens, it makes you look foolish at best, and callously dishonest at worst.

OF COURSE NOT ALL TRANSWOMEN ARE CRIMINALS. Some of the best male people I know are transwomen.

HOWEVER.

1) ALL TRANSWOMEN ARE MALE;
2) MALES AS A CLASS ARE A DANGER TO WOMEN AND CHILDREN;
3) THE LABEL "TRANSGENDER" REQUIRES NO MEANINGFUL TRANSITION;

THE ISSUE IS NOT TRANS PEOPLE USING PUBLIC RESTROOMS.

THE ISSUE IS MALE PEOPLE USING FEMALE RESTROOMS. 

If males are not dangerous, why do we have sex-segregated bathrooms in the first place? And what the Hell do you think actual transwomen are afraid of in the men's room? Evil urinals? No, it's males. If their fears are valid, why piss on the fears of female people??

Most women, including myself, support laws that allow transwomen access to female spaces with 1) documentation of meaningful transition and 2) improper purpose clauses.

This is a more than reasonable compromise.

The only people who have reason to object to this compromise are males who want to access female spaces with no documentation of transition in order to engage in criminal activity. Please stop gaslighting women who want protection from those males.




*Editing to add: if your objections to HB2 are the clauses separate from bathroom access, for goodness' sake wake up and stop allowing all Leftist causes to be chained to the concrete block of overly broad gender identity laws. Thanks.

Thursday, January 7, 2016

Every man on Earth owes his life to a woman

Every man on Earth owes his life to a woman.

This is a very simple, undeniable fact.

No man would exist if a woman did not do the difficult, dangerous work of incubating him inside her female body.

It doesn't matter if you think your mother was a bad mother. It doesn't matter if she left you on a stranger's doorstep. You would not exist if she did not physically make you.

Ovulation, menstruation, pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding - all part of the biological work women do to continue human life - including yours. Stop acting like they are a sign of weakness or subhumanity. You would not exist without those female biological functions you find so unspeakably gross.

I'm not arguing for matriarchy nor the worship of a mother goddess. I'm simply arguing for recognizing and accepting the fact that every man on Earth owes his life to a woman.

You don't have to "bow down" to women/mothers. Just be mature and honest and grateful enough for the reproductive work that led to your very existence that you won't 1) impose that work on unwilling women; 2) punish that work; 3) denigrate that work; or 4) erase that work.

Thank you and good day.


Wednesday, January 6, 2016

A conversation between MRAs


MRA1: The most oppressed people on Earth are men like us who are not getting all the male privilege to which our dicks should entitle us.

MRA2: Hear hear! Women don't pay me the attention they owe me. So how do we get them to center us in everything they do?

MRA1: Hear me out. We use transsexuals.

MRA2: Wait, what?

MRA1: We start out simple: "Transwomen are women, period." This makes an opening in the category "woman."

MRA2: Wait, you mean, chicks with dicks?

MRA1: Yeah man, but nevermind porn for a second OK? We say they're just chicks, period. This will be the easy part. Nobody wants to accept that some males are very feminine, nobody even wants to think about SRS. *shivers*

MRA2: Geez, bro.

MRA1: Right? They'll want to hand-wave it all away, like yes, sure, transwomen are women, they're weirdos but I'm liberal and super-tolerant of weirdos like women who think they're just as human as men, black people who think they're just as human as white people, and gay people who think gay sex is normal. *snicker*

MRA2: I don't mind some girl on g-

MRA1: I said nevermind porn for a second! God.

MRA2: Sorry.

MRA1: My point is, they'll just want to shove transwomen into their "approved weirdo box" so they can point to it and feel extra cool!

MRA2: Pfft. Libtards.

MRA1: I know right? Anyway, then we get to the harder part, where we re-define "transwoman."

MRA2: What do you mean?

MRA1: We say that what makes a dude a transwoman is a special feeling inside. A woman feeling.

MRA2: But won't the feminazis protest that there is no "woman feeling"?

MRA1: Yeah, even though we all know women are like delicate little children inside, while men have to be the adults and do all the work and fighting.

MRA2: I know, they have it so easy.

MRA1: Yeah, but we're not allowed to say all that out loud, so instead we just leverage how gross female biology is!

MRA2: OMG periods are so gross.

MRA1: Don't even get me started on breastfeeding.

MRA2: So gross! Boobs are to make my penis happy, not to feed babies!

MRA1: Anyway. We say that to define women as human females is to reduce them to their female parts, which everybody knows are gross.

MRA2: Isn't that like saying the phrase "black people" reduces people to their epidermises?

MRA1: Exactly! And we all know we're supposed to be colorblind, right? We're supposed to pretend black people are human even though they aren't white! We're supposed to pretend women are human even though they aren't male! Liberals want us to politely pretend, well quid pro quo, they should be willing to pretend penises are female!

MRA2: What? No. No way, man! Won't actual transsexuals protest this? I mean, they want SRS, right? Not just to call their penises female?

MRA1: Don't worry about that, nobody wants to listen to a tranny, they'll just want to use trannies as disgust tolerance merit badges!

MRA2: Oh, right. Genius.

MRA1: So, we go for: Anybody with a dick who claims special lady feelings is a transwoman. No dysmorphia required, no transition required. We can claim to be transwomen, but still keep our dicks. If we push it far enough we can even keep our neckbeards.

MRA2: Whoa.

MRA1: I know, right? Feminism is about women. Only women belong in women's spaces. But transwomen are women. And any dude is a transwoman if he says so. So any dude can claim the right to women's attention and care just by claiming special lady feelings!

MRA2: This can't work. Even liberals aren't that dumb.

MRA1: We'll see.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

The psychological underpinnings of liberal support for transgender identity politics


It really is this simple:

  • If you aren't disgusted by transwomen, you won't have to lie to yourself about them.
  • If you don't hate women, you won't erase femaleness or feminism.
  • And if you aren't terrified of men, you'll hold them responsible for the violence they commit.

Disgust, hatred and fear. Every emotion you project onto TERFs.

THE CALL IS COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE.

Sunday, September 20, 2015

Gender charts and graphics

I am no graphic designer, but I often try to get my ideas across visually, whether in charts or graphics. I have gathered most of them here for easy access.

Gender crit cheat sheet, also available as one page PDF:




Clarifying gender:







Another chart:


And related graphics:





A couple more charts, re. gender & race. First, on liberal power-blindness:


Next, on white vs. "cis":


More on "cis":




Intersectionality:


On brain sex/gender identity:





On "feeling like a woman":





On AFTAs (anti-feminist trans activists):






And more:








Some new additions-

On transing kids:




On blaming women:




To sum up: